Crypto Investment Loss Calculator
Degen Zoo (DZOO) Investment Analysis
Based on data from the article, DZOO has declined over 98% from launch value with minimal trading volume and questionable charity claims.
Results
Enter your investment amount to see potential losses.
Degen Zoo (DZOO) isn't another crypto project trying to make you rich. It was built to call out a scam. Launched in March 2023, Degen Zoo emerged as a direct rebuttal to Logan Paulâs Crypto Zoo, which its creators called "nothing more than total fraud." Instead of promising returns, DZOOâs whole purpose was to highlight how fake animal-themed crypto games exploit peopleâs emotions - and then use the money raised to actually help real animals in danger.
The token started with a simple idea: take the same hype-driven model used by Crypto Zoo, but flip it. All profits from DZOO trading were supposed to go to charities protecting endangered species. The initial coin offering (ICO) ran from March 7 to 10, 2023, raising $1.65 million at $0.006 per token. That was the only real moment of momentum. After that, the project barely moved.
Today, DZOO trades as an ERC-20 token on the Ethereum blockchain. But its numbers tell a different story. On October 26, 2025, its price hovers between $0.00167 and $0.00173 - down more than 98% from its highest point. Some sources say it peaked at $0.086; others say $0.028. Either way, itâs a fraction of its launch value. The market cap? Around $700,000 to $9 million, depending on which site you check. The inconsistency isnât a glitch - itâs a red flag. No real market is that fractured.
Trading volume is almost nonexistent. CoinMarketCap shows $0 in 24-hour volume. CoinGecko reports $1.16. Stoic AI says $2. For a token with over 270 million in circulation, thatâs a ghost town. If no one is buying or selling, the price you see isnât real - itâs just a number on a screen. And yet, some sites still list it as up 197% month-over-month. That doesnât mean demand is growing. It means a handful of wallets are moving coins around to fake the appearance of activity.
The supply numbers donât add up either. KuCoin says there are 1 billion DZOO tokens max, with 334 million in circulation. Cryptorank says 800 million total, 270 million circulating. CoinLore says 1 billion total and max. No one agrees. Thatâs not normal. Legitimate projects publish clear, audited tokenomics. Degen Zoo doesnât. Its documentation is thin. Thereâs no whitepaper. No GitHub repo with code updates. No team bios. Just a Twitter account with 2,348 followers and no posts since 2023.
Even the charity angle is murky. The official Twitter account announced in March 2023 that "100% of profits go to animal charities." But thereâs zero public record of any donations. No receipts. No charity partnerships listed. No press releases. No blockchain transactions linking DZOO profits to animal welfare orgs. If this was a real charity project, youâd see updates. Youâd see names like WWF or the Wildlife Conservation Society. Youâd see photos of rescued animals. Youâd see proof. You donât.
Compare it to real charity tokens like Pinkcoin or World Food Chain. They have active communities, regular donation reports, and years of transaction history. Degen Zoo has nothing. Itâs not just inactive - itâs abandoned. Reddit threads about DZOO are sparse. One user in March 2023 summed it up: "another Logan Paul copycat token that will go to zero." That comment got 24 upvotes. People got it.
Why does this matter? Because Degen Zoo isnât just a failed crypto. Itâs a lesson. It shows how easily a project can ride the wave of outrage to raise money - and then vanish. It exploited the anger people felt toward Logan Paulâs Crypto Zoo. But it never built anything lasting. No app. No game. No community. No transparency. Just a token with a noble goal and zero follow-through.
Itâs still listed on KuCoin and a few other small exchanges. But no one is trading it. No one is talking about it. No one is donating through it. The only people still checking its price are those hoping itâll bounce back - a classic case of sunk cost fallacy. The tokenâs technical specs are fine (it runs on Ethereum), but thatâs like saying a broken car has good tires. The engine is dead.
If youâre looking to support animal charities, there are better ways. Donate directly. Use platforms like Binance Charity or The Giving Block, which have real partnerships, audits, and public tracking. Donât waste time on a crypto thatâs more of a protest sign than a project.
Degen Zooâs story isnât about money. Itâs about intention. It started with a real purpose: to expose fraud. But without accountability, even the best intentions fade. And now, DZOO is just another footnote in cryptoâs long list of abandoned ideas - a ghost token with a conscience, but no future.
Comments
This is absolutely devastating. đ„ș Degen Zoo had such a noble heart, but without accountability, even the purest intentions become hollow echoes in the void of crypto. I weep for the animals who never received a single cent. đđ
DZOO was never about profit it was about protest and now its just a ghost story with a blockchain
This is a textbook case of how emotion can be weaponized in DeFi. The project had a moral compass, but zero operational structure. No whitepaper, no team, no audits - itâs like building a hospital with no doctors.
The lack of transparency here is not merely negligent-it is ethically indefensible. A project purporting to fund animal welfare must, by any standard of fiduciary duty, provide verifiable, blockchain-traceable donation records. Its absence constitutes fraud by omission.
I get why people got excited. It felt good to fight back against Logan Paulâs scam. But good intentions donât build sustainable systems. Maybe next time, we build the infrastructure before we launch the message.
Oh wow. A charity token that didnât donate? Shocking. Next youâll tell me the Tooth Fairy doesnât collect crypto. đ€Ą The fact that anyone still checks the price is proof that humans are the only species that willingly pay to watch their own financial corpses rot.
I'm genuinely appalled. This isn't just a failed project-it's a moral betrayal. The creators exploited righteous anger to rake in $1.65 million and then vanished. Thatâs not activism. Thatâs predatory capitalism in a panda hoodie.
This was all a setup by the Fed to discredit crypto charity. They knew DZOO was too real, so they buried it. Look at the volume discrepancies-those are coordinated wash trades by central banks trying to make crypto look unstable. The real animals? Theyâre being held captive in underground labs.
I think the real win here is awareness. Even though DZOO died, it showed people how easily a scam can be dressed up as a movement. Thatâs valuable. Now more folks know to check for audits, team transparency, and donation trails before investing in anything labeled 'charity'.
Itâs so sad but also kind of beautiful that something meant to help animals became a symbol of how we break things we claim to love đđŸ Maybe if we all just donated directly instead of chasing tokens, weâd actually be making a difference. Sending love to all the real creatures out there.
The structural flaw here wasnât the idea-it was the execution. A charity token requires governance, accountability, and communication. Without those, youâre not building a movement; youâre building a digital monument to performative activism. The tokenomics were a distraction from the real work: building trust.
You people are missing the point. DZOO didnât fail-it succeeded. It exposed Crypto Zoo as a scam. The fact that no one talks about it anymore means the mission worked. The scam got canceled. The tokenâs dead? Good. Thatâs the point.
Ohhh, so now weâre supposed to feel bad because a token with no whitepaper, no team, and zero donations... didnât turn into a unicorn? Please. The only thing more tragic than DZOO is the fact that someone still thinks itâs worth a second thought.
I remember when this launched. I didnât buy in, but I cheered. It felt like justice. Now I just feel sorry-for the animals, for the people who thought this was real, and for the fact that we keep letting ourselves be fooled by the same script over and over.
India also had many such tokens. People invest for emotion not logic. This is not unique. Just another crypto ghost.
Iâm genuinely shocked that this was ever listed on KuCoin. Any exchange that allows a project with no team, no documentation, and zero donation proof to remain trading is complicit in market manipulation. This isnât crypto-itâs a Ponzi theater with animal emojis.
Itâs dead. Move on.
The absence of audited financial disclosures, coupled with the demonstrable lack of blockchain-based charitable disbursements, constitutes a material breach of the implied contractual obligations established by the projectâs public representations. Legal recourse, though practically unenforceable, remains theoretically viable.